From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Clinical Practice Guideline Watch

New Guidelines Tweak Criteria for HIV Treatment

Treatment at earlier stages of illness is endorsed, but the newest agents should be reserved for salvage therapy.

As the number of marketed single and combination antiretroviral agents approaches three dozen, experts continue to modify recommendations on who should receive these drugs, and which combinations are most effective.

The newest iteration of HIV treatment guidelines from the International AIDS Society–USA (1 of 2 sets that dictate standard practice in the U.S.) points to recent epidemiologic data that suggest that, even in people with high CD4-cell counts, untreated HIV infection constitutes risk for cancer and organ failure. The guidelines suggest that individuals with a rapid rate of CD4 decline, HIV viral loads >100,000 copies/mL, hepatitis B or C coinfection, HIV-associated nephropathy, or substantial cardiovascular risk factors be considered for treatment, even when they have CD4 counts ≥350 cells/µL — the trigger level in previous guidelines.

Recommended drugs for initial treatment include efavirenz or one of several ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors, in conjunction with two nucleoside drugs. Neither azidothymidine (AZT) nor stavudine (d4T) is endorsed for initial treatment because of their relative toxicity. The newest antiretroviral agents, belonging to novel drug families, including the integrase inhibitor raltegravir (Isentress) and the CCR5 antagonist maraviroc (Selzentry), should still be reserved for treatment-experienced patients, and the new nonnucleoside drug etravirine (Intelence) also is not proposed for initial treatment. When abacavir-containing regimens are considered, patients should be prescreened for human leukocyte antigen (HLA) B-5701, which predicts hypersensitivity to that drug.

Comment: Asymptomatic HIV-positive patients were more likely to be treated 2 decades ago than in recent years, but now, as treatment regimens become less cumbersome, the pendulum is swinging back. As with all previous guidelines, this new set recognizes that considerations of drug intolerance, drug interactions, and individual patient preference inevitably will force creative modifications to both timing and content of antiretroviral regimens.

Abigail Zuger, MD

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine August 14, 2008

Citation(s):

Hammer SM et al. Antiretroviral treatment of adult HIV infection: 2008 recommendations of the International AIDS Society–USA panel. JAMA 2008 Aug 6; 300:555.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Other Perspectives

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2008. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.