From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Maternal Weight and Congenital Anomalies

Overweight and obesity were associated with excess risk for several anomalies.

During pregnancy, being overweight (body-mass index, 25–30 kg/m2) or obese (BMI, >30) confers substantial risks for both mother and child for several conditions, including gestational diabetes, hypertension, operative delivery, macrosomia, and birth trauma. U.K. investigators examined specific risk for congenital anomalies in a meta-analysis of 18 studies (published from 1966–2008).

Compared with women at recommended BMIs, obese women delivered infants with higher risk for several congenital anomalies, including spina bifida (odds ratio, 2.24), neural-tube defects (OR, 1.87), hydrocephaly (1.68), anorectal atresia (1.48), limb reduction anomalies (1.34), cardiovascular anomalies (1.30), and cleft palate (1.23). The ORs associated with overweight mothers compared with those of mothers at recommended BMIs were somewhat smaller but still significantly elevated for neural-tube defects (1.20) and cardiovascular anomalies (1.17) and nonsignificantly elevated for the other anomalies.

Comment: The authors propose several potential mechanisms for this excess risk, including insulin resistance and hyperglycemia, but they point particularly to folic acid deficiency. Obesity is associated with reduced folate levels, and several of these anomalies occur at nearly the same time in development. Risk for marked structural anomaly in all pregnancies is roughly 3%, so these odds ratios are not clinically unimportant and provide yet one more reason to encourage prevention of obesity or to treat it in women before they become pregnant.

Thomas L. Schwenk, MD

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine February 12, 2009

Citation(s):

Stothard KJ et al. Maternal overweight and obesity and the risk of congenital anomalies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2009 Feb 11; 301:636.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Related Content

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2009. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.