From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Poor Communication in Hospital Readmissions

Discharging and readmitting physicians communicated on only about half the patients who returned within 2 weeks.

When patients who are discharged from a hospital are readmitted, do the discharging and readmitting medical teams communicate with each other? To examine this issue, researchers at two Boston teaching hospitals surveyed residents and attending physicians about patients who required short-term readmission after being discharged from general medicine services.

Of 432 consecutive patients who were discharged and readmitted within the next 14 days, 123 had common providers on both teams, and 84 had planned readmissions; thus, 225 cases were analyzed. Discharging teams were aware that their patients had been readmitted in only 49% of cases, and communication occurred between teams in only 44% of cases. When communication did not occur, 61% of respondents believed that communication would have been beneficial.

Comment: These results won’t surprise physicians who work in systems in which hospitalist or resident-attending teams rotate every few weeks. Better communication likely would enhance quality of care: In caring for hospitalized patients, we learn valuable medical and psychosocial information that doesn’t always appear in discharge summaries. Failure to communicate also results in lost learning opportunities: We surely learn valuable lessons when we see what happens to our patients shortly after hospital discharge. Creating systems to ensure communication between discharging physicians and readmitting physicians simply makes good sense.

Allan S. Brett, MD

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine April 2, 2009

Citation(s):

Roy CL et al. Hospital readmissions: Physician awareness and communication practices. J Gen Intern Med 2009 Mar; 24:374.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2009. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.