From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Early Estimate of Pandemic Potential of Influenza A H1N1 "Swine Flu"

The current virus is transmitted efficiently but probably is less lethal than past pandemic viruses.

A team of epidemiologists has analyzed the influenza A (H1N1) epidemic in Mexico. Data related to the outbreak were collected primarily in April and early May 2009. The researchers presented several tentative conclusions:

  • Cases outside of Mexico occurred most commonly in countries that had the highest volume of travelers from Mexico.
  • Attack rates of clinical disease are higher in children younger than 15 years than in adults (relative risk for children, 1.52). This finding suggests that, although the virus is novel, adults might have some protection due to cross-immunity from exposure to strains that have circulated in the past.
  • The virus is transmitted more efficiently from person to person than are usual seasonal flu viruses.
  • The estimated fatality rate is 0.4% — this virus is considerably less lethal than the virus that caused the 1918–1919 pandemic but somewhat more lethal than usual seasonal flu viruses.

Comment: These data indicate that the current H1N1 virus is more transmissible and possibly more lethal than regular seasonal flu viruses, but it is considerably less transmissible and lethal than the catastrophic 1918–1919 pandemic virus. However, influenza viruses mutate rapidly, and this virus could change considerably in the coming months. The 1918–1919 virus also was mild when it first appeared in the spring of 1918, but it killed about 3% of people that it infected when it returned the next winter.

Anthony L. Komaroff, MD

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine May 21, 2009

Citation(s):

Fraser C et al. Pandemic potential of a strain of influenza A (H1N1): Early findings. Science 2009 May 14; [e-pub ahead of print]. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1176062)

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. We ask that you keep your remarks to a reasonable length, and we reserve the right to withhold publication of remarks that do not meet this standard.

The editors of Journal Watch may respond to Reader Remarks, but we cannot promise to respond to a particular remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Related Content

Sign-In

Forgot your password? Login via Athens
or your institution

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2009. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.