From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Is 140/90 Low Enough for Nondiabetic Hypertensive Patients?

A study supports a more aggressive approach to BP reduction.

Most guidelines recommend 140/90 mm Hg as the blood pressure target for nondiabetic patients with hypertension. But, no randomized trials of systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction to ≤130 mm Hg have been conducted in this population.

With funding from three pharmaceutical manufacturers, Italian investigators randomized 1111 nondiabetic hypertensive patients to tight (<130 mm Hg) or usual (<140 mm Hg) SBP control. Patients (age, ≥55) had baseline SBP levels of ≥150 mm Hg after receiving antihypertensive therapy for at least 12 weeks and had at least one other cardiovascular risk factor. Treatment was open-label and individualized and included previous (background) therapy plus various combinations of furosemide, hydrochlorothiazide, ramipril, telmisartan (Micardis), amlodipine, bisoprolol, and clonidine.

Clinicians measured blood pressure by auscultation every 4 months and reported the average of three seated readings after 10 minutes of rest. In the tight-control group, one SBP reading >130 mm Hg at any visit led to intensification of treatment; in the usual-control group, one SBP reading <130 at any visit led to down-titration of treatment. The primary endpoint was prevalence of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), as assessed by blinded readers.

At baseline, blood pressures were equal in the two groups, and roughly 20% of patients in each group had LVH. After 2 years, 27% and 72% of patients in the usual- and tight-control groups, respectively, had SBP <130 mm Hg, and significantly more patients in the usual-control group than in the tight-control group (17.0% vs. 11.4%) had LVH. In addition, significantly more patients in the usual-control group than in the tight-control group (9.4% vs. 4.8%) reached a secondary composite endpoint that consisted of any of nine adverse clinical cardiovascular outcomes.

Comment: Left ventricular hypertrophy is not a clinical endpoint, but it is a powerful predictor of cardiovascular events. According to this study, an aggressive approach to blood pressure reduction can be well-tolerated and might lower the incidence of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Larger and longer studies will be required to measure individual cardiovascular outcomes directly and to test this hypothesis in patients at lower baseline risk.

Bruce Soloway, MD

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine August 27, 2009

Citation(s):

Verdecchia P et al. Usual versus tight control of systolic blood pressure in non-diabetic patients with hypertension (Cardio-Sis): An open-label randomised trial. Lancet 2009 Aug 15; 374:525.

Reader Remarks:

Read all Reader Remarks on this article

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

(more...)

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2009. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.