From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Feature

Spotlight on Colchicine: The Colcrys Controversy

A very old drug gets new marketing exclusivity — at what cost?

On April 16, 2010, we summarized an article on an industry-sponsored randomized trial of colchicine for acute gout flares (JW Gen Med Apr 16 2010). But why did a drug company choose to perform this study? The answer to that question sheds light on a new controversy surrounding an old drug.

In 2006, the FDA launched the "Unapproved Drugs Initiative," which targeted old drugs that had never been approved by the FDA. The rationale was that older unapproved drugs, including colchicine, deserve as much scrutiny for efficacy and safety as do newer drugs. In response to this initiative, the drug company URL Pharma decided to conduct pharmacokinetic and clinical research on colchicine with the intention of bringing it to market as a brand-name product. The clinical trial covered by Journal Watch General Medicine was sponsored by URL Pharma and was a key factor in the FDA's approval of brand-name colchicine (Colcrys) in 2009.

In that trial, patients with acute gout were randomized to receive an oral "low-dose" colchicine regimen (1.2-mg dose initially, followed by a single 0.6-mg dose 1 hour later), a "high-dose" colchicine regimen (1.2-mg dose initially, followed by 0.6 mg hourly for 6 hours), or placebo. At 24 hours, patients in the low-dose group were significantly more likely than placebo recipients to report a ≥50% reduction in pain (38% vs. 16% of patients), and side effects were similar in those two groups. In contrast, patients who received hourly dosing for 6 hours had substantial gastrointestinal toxicity but no additional benefit compared with low-dose patients.

The controversy enters the picture here: URL Pharma has been given market exclusivity for 3 years, and companies that produce "nonapproved" colchicine — the products that we've prescribed for decades — are required to phase out production in 2010. Patients will experience this transition as an extraordinary increase in the cost of the drug: Colcrys sells for US$5 per pill, whereas nonapproved colchicine costs pennies per pill.

URL Pharma, the FDA, and healthcare professionals (notably the physician leadership of the American College of Rheumatology) have been engaged in a rather testy debate about these developments. The drug company and the FDA defend their position that efficacy and safety are enhanced because Colcrys is manufactured with FDA oversight and because the prescribing information provides guidance on indications, dosing, and drug interactions. In contrast, the American College of Rheumatology contends that, with responsible prescribing, nonapproved colchicine is safe and effective and that patients who cannot afford Colcrys will suffer. URL Pharma has countered with a program to assist low-income patients.

Practical clinical issues have been overlooked in this debate. The FDA-approved prescribing regimen for Colcrys in patients with acute gout flares is the low-dose regimen from the randomized trial — 1.2 mg initially, followed by 0.6 mg at 1 hour — and nothing else. In the clinical trial, assessment of efficacy ended at 24 hours, because providing ongoing placebo for a painful condition was considered to be unethical. However, most colchicine-treated patients still had substantial pain at 24 hours. How should we manage those patients, who will need further treatment? Switching to a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) or prednisone makes no sense: Most clinicians consider using colchicine for acute gout precisely in patients with contraindications to NSAIDs or prednisone, which are the usual first-line oral treatments. Stated another way, why would we pick an initial treatment regimen that likely will require "rescue" therapy within 24 hours? A 1-week comparison between a low-dose colchicine regimen and a standard NSAID regimen would have been far more clinically relevant than the comparison in the published study.

In the end, I doubt whether the marketing of Colcrys will change the way most of us manage acute gout flares. Indeed, clinicians generally prescribe colchicine not for acute gout but rather for long-term prophylaxis. In fact, the FDA has approved Colcrys for prophylaxis at a dose of 0.6 mg once or twice daily. It's the cost of long-term prophylaxis — $1800 to $3600 per year at full price — that will likely have patients and clinicians scrambling during the next few years. For more on this topic, we invite you to listen to our interview with Aaron S. Kesselheim, MD, JD, MPH (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA).

Allan S. Brett, MD

The New England Journal of Medicine recently published an essay by Dr. Aaron S. Kesselheim and Dr. Daniel H. Solomon on the regulatory aspects of the Colcrys controversy (N Engl J Med 2010; 362:2045). The perspectives on Colcrys of URL Pharma and the American College of Rheumatology are available free of charge.

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine June 10, 2010

Reader Remarks:

Review and add to remarks on this article

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. We ask that you keep your remarks to a reasonable length, and we reserve the right to withhold publication of remarks that do not meet this standard.

The editors of Journal Watch may respond to Reader Remarks, but we cannot promise to respond to a particular remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Sign-In

Forgot your password? Login via Athens
or your institution

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2010. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.