From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. General Medicine>
  4. Summary and Comment

Niacin Is Ineffective in Patients with Established Cardiovascular Disease

Niacin plus simvastatin was no better than simvastatin alone.

Physicians sometimes prescribe niacin for statin-treated patients to raise HDL cholesterol levels or to manipulate lipid subfractions detected by more elaborate lipid testing. However, the clinical effect of this practice is unclear. In the NIH-sponsored AIM-HIGH study, 3414 patients with established cardiovascular disease were randomized to receive simvastatin plus either extended-release niacin or placebo. Enrollment criteria included HDL cholesterol levels <40 mg/dL for men and <50 mg/dL for women, and triglyceride levels between 150 and 400 mg/dL. Patients were selected for randomization only after completing an open-label run-in phase, during which they demonstrated that they could tolerate high niacin doses (1500–2000 mg daily). During the trial, most patients took 40-mg or 80-mg simvastatin daily; the LDL cholesterol target was <80 mg/dL. Most patients also received aspirin, β-blockers, and angiotensin-converting–enzyme inhibitors.

Compared with placebo, niacin therapy induced significant changes in LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. Nevertheless, the trial was stopped after average follow-up of 3 years when no hint of cardiovascular benefits and a trend toward more strokes with niacin were reported. The primary outcome (a composite of adverse coronary events, strokes, and revascularization) occurred in 16% of patients in each group; the incidence of stroke was 1.7% with niacin and 1.1% with placebo (P=0.09).

Comment: These results — first announced in May 2011 (JW Gen Med Jun 7 2011) — are straightforward: Extended-release niacin doesn't benefit patients with known cardiovascular disease who achieve low LDL cholesterol levels with statin monotherapy (the average LDL cholesterol level in this study's statin-plus-placebo group was about 70 mg/dL). Note that this study was purely a secondary prevention trial; we also have no evidence that niacin improves outcomes in contemporary primary prevention.

Allan S. Brett, MD

Published in Journal Watch General Medicine November 15, 2011

Citation(s):

The AIM-HIGH Investigators. Niacin in patients with low HDL cholesterol levels receiving intensive statin therapy. N Engl J Med 2011 Nov 15; [e-pub ahead of print]. (http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1107579)

Reader Remarks:

Review and add to remarks on this article

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. We ask that you keep your remarks to a reasonable length, and we reserve the right to withhold publication of remarks that do not meet this standard.

The editors of Journal Watch may respond to Reader Remarks, but we cannot promise to respond to a particular remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Sign-In

Forgot your password? Login via Athens
or your institution

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2011. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.