From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Reader Remarks

Reader Remarks on:

Revascularization Is Ineffective for Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis

Renin

Joe Reynolds, 13 Nov 2009 7:41 AM EST

Competing interests: None declared

I was wondering if the Renin levels pre and post op were measured

back to top

Fibromuscular dysplasia of renal artery

Barbara A McFee, 12 Nov 2009 6:26 PM EST

Competing interests: None declared

Have studies been done of patients with FMD and if so are the results published?

back to top

renal revascularization

Darol Joseff MD, 13 Nov 2009 10:59 AM EST

Competing interests: None declared

The real conclusion seems to be that renal revascularization doesn't help in those cases where the treating physician is 'uncertain' it would help. Unfortunately, the authors did not include the data from patients who were thought to 'require' revascularization. So, it seems that the study design limited the possible conclusions, and the authors rightly acknowledge this. Thus, the title 'Revascularization Is Ineffective for Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis' is not actually supported by the evidence presented. It'll take a clever editor to create an accurate title for this paper.

Since 25% of persons in the US over age 65 have some detectable renal artery stenosis, it's obvious that most don't require revascularization. However, if they do have 'renovascular hypertension' (RVH, by the way, is defined as a retrospective diagnosis) or, perhaps more accurately, 'renoprival disease', they may benefit from renal revascularization. Unfortunately, the 'sound bite' view of this article, even the title, may be improperly used by insurers to deny coverage for even those carefully selected patients who may actually benefit from revascularization.

back to top

complications

d t, usa, 15 Nov 2009 2:26 PM EST

Competing interests: None declared

ten percent major complications!! what are they doing... possibly learning angioplasty in us we do it for less than 1 % or better

back to top

Rx RAS

Newell Falkinburg, 19 Nov 2009 3:32 PM EST

Competing interests: None declared

Were they studying unilateral RAS or Bilat RAS or both.

Looks like sloppy reporting to me .

back to top

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. We ask that you keep your remarks to a reasonable length, and we reserve the right to withhold publication of remarks that do not meet this standard.

The editors of Journal Watch may respond to Reader Remarks, but we cannot promise to respond to a particular remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Sign-In

Forgot your password? Login via Athens
or your institution

New to Journal Watch?



Copyright © 2012. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.